Transforming Behavioral Health Access Through Integrated Virtual Care, Early Detection, and Continuous Support

GlobalMed's integrated behavioral health platform addresses these barriers through accessible prevention, early detection, and immediate clinical access. eNcounter® provides 24/7 virtual access to licensed behavioral health providers. MoodHacker® delivers evidence-based digital cognitive behavioral therapy tools accessible between clinical appointments. Vocal biomarker analysis powered by Canary Speech may identify speech characteristics associated with depression, anxiety, suicide risk, and cognitive decline.

This approach extends provider capacity to underserved populations, enables earlier intervention, and maintains care continuity across operational environments where traditional delivery models face constraints. GlobalMed supports healthcare delivery in over 60 countries and has enabled more than 100 million patient consultations.

1. The Care Access Crisis

Cultural acceptance of mental health treatment has increased substantially in recent years. Organizations implement workplace mental health programs, public awareness campaigns reduce stigma, and generally, individuals demonstrate greater willingness to discuss behavioral health challenges openly. These shifts represent significant progress in normalizing mental health care as essential healthcare rather than a discretionary service.

However, increased demand has not been matched by corresponding increases in provider capacity or care delivery infrastructure. The result is a widening gap between those who need behavioral health services and those who can access them in a timely manner. This access crisis manifests across multiple dimensions: provider availability, geographic distribution, appointment scheduling, and treatment continuity.

Table 1: The Behavioral Health Access Gap

These access barriers affect diverse populations, with particularly acute impacts on groups experiencing elevated risk. Military personnel and Veterans face higher PTSD prevalence rates: 23% among VA healthcare users compared to 6% in the general population.⁷ First responders develop behavioral health conditions at rates 50% higher than the general population.⁸ For these populations, access delays can directly affect operational readiness and public safety.

Provider Capacity Constraints

Current capacity limitations reflect both immediate workforce challenges and longer-term supply constraints. By 2038, the United States is projected to face shortages of 99,840 psychologists and 99,780 mental health counselors.⁹ These projections assume current training pipeline outputs continue, which appears increasingly uncertain given provider burnout rates. A 2023 survey found that 93% of behavioral health professionals have experienced burnout, with 62% experiencing severe burnout.¹⁰ High burnout rates accelerate workforce attrition while discouraging new professionals from entering the field, compounding supply challenges that workforce expansion alone cannot address within realistic timeframes.

Geographic Barriers

Provider concentration in urban and suburban areas creates structural barriers to access for rural populations. Even when rural residents can identify available providers, appointment access can require substantial travel. Routine appointments become multi-hour commitments when travel time is factored in. Follow-up care requiring regular sessions becomes unsustainable for individuals managing work schedules, childcare responsibilities, or transportation limitations. These practical barriers convert theoretical access into functional inaccessibility, leaving populations nominally served by distant providers but practically unable to engage with ongoing treatment.

Limitations of Current Models

The mismatch between continuous symptom development and episodic care delivery creates fundamental limitations. Behavioral health symptoms fluctuate across hours and days. Providers see patients during brief scheduled windows, making clinical decisions based on patients' recollections of experiences between appointments. Memory biases, social desirability effects, and limited insight affect the accuracy of self-reported information. Providers lack direct observation of daily functioning, environmental triggers, the application of coping strategies, and early warning signs of deterioration. This information asymmetry limits treatment personalization and delays recognition of treatment non-response. Digital tools that operate independently of clinical workflows compound this fragmentation by creating parallel systems without data integration or coordinated escalation pathways.

2. The Early Intervention Imperative

Delayed Intervention Consequences

The consequences of delayed intervention extend beyond symptom severity. Research using VA emergency department data found that an 11.7-day increase in mental health appointment wait times raised two-year mortality by 1.5%, an effect that persisted for at least five years.¹¹ The primary mechanism is disengagement: longer waits reduce follow-up appointment attendance, breaking the continuity of care that supports recovery. When intervention is delayed long enough, individuals often reach crisis points. Approximately one in eight emergency room visits in the United States involves mental health or substance abuse disorders, and such patients are substantially more likely to require hospitalization.¹² More than 40,000 people die by suicide annually, largely attributable to untreated mental illness.¹³ Cumulatively, untreated mental illness costs the U.S. economy $282 billion annually.¹⁴

Early Identification Through Technology

Technology creates opportunities for earlier identification through passive detection and continuous monitoring. Vocal biomarker analysis may identify speech pattern changes associated with depression, anxiety, cognitive decline, and other behavioral health concerns, potentially enabling earlier clinical review. Digital cognitive behavioral therapy platforms provide continuous engagement between appointments, allowing individuals to practice skills when situations occur rather than discussing them retrospectively. These tools generate longitudinal data that inform clinical assessment, providing providers with comprehensive perspectives on functioning rather than appointment-only snapshots.

However, detection and self-management tools create value only when connected to clinical intervention pathways. Identifying risk without triggering a response fails to address identified needs. Self-care platforms without escalation mechanisms leave individuals managing alone when symptoms exceed self-management capabilities. Integration of detection, self-management, and clinical access ensures that identified needs connect to appropriate interventions.

3. The Integrated Behavioral Health Ecosystem

GlobalMed's behavioral health platform addresses the complete care continuum through three integrated components that provide prevention, early detection, and clinical intervention capabilities. Unlike standalone digital tools that operate independently of clinical workflows, this approach creates a closed-loop system where self-management, passive monitoring, and provider access function as coordinated elements of continuous care.

Table 2: Three-Component Solution Overview

eNcounter®: Immediate Clinical Access

eNcounter®, a secure digital health platform, provides on-demand access to licensed behavioral health clinicians. The service connects individuals experiencing acute distress, those seeking ongoing counseling, or patients requiring psychiatric evaluation with appropriate providers without scheduling delays. This capability is particularly valuable in operational environments where traditional appointment-based care is constrained by geographic dispersion, shift work, or deployment cycles.

The platform supports crisis intervention, ongoing therapy, psychiatric medication management, and care coordination. Additionally, GlobalMed's interoperability with Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems streamlines workflows into a single platform rather than disparate systems. Clinicians can access patient histories, review data from integrated tools, and document encounters all in one place. This infrastructure also maintains continuity when patients move between locations or transition between care settings.

Evidence supports virtual care's impact on treatment engagement. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 45 studies found that telehealth patients had 39% lower odds of missing appointments compared to in-person care (OR = 0.61, p < 0.0001).¹⁵ Patients in virtual behavioral health treatment also complete their programs at substantially higher rates: 60.5% compared to 44.0% for in-person counterparts.¹⁶ These improvements in attendance and completion translate directly into more consistent care delivery and better treatment outcomes.

MoodHacker®: Self-Guided Resilience

MoodHacker® delivers evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy tools through digital platforms accessible whenever needed. Its evidence base includes a randomized controlled trial funded by an NIH National Institute of Mental Health Phase II SBIR grant (R44MH073280), which found significant effects on depression symptoms, behavioral activation, and depression knowledge among adults self-managing mild-to-moderate depression, with a dose-response pattern: the more participants used the program, the greater their improvements.¹⁷ 

The application provides guided exercises based on CBT principles, positive psychology, and self-determination theory. Users identify thought patterns, develop coping strategies, track mood variations, and practice techniques in real situations as they occur rather than discussing them retrospectively during appointments.

Engagement data from MoodHacker® provides clinical context when patients connect with providers. Clinicians review which techniques patients have attempted, whether they practice skills consistently, and the challenges encountered during self-management efforts. This information informs treatment planning and allows providers to reinforce effective strategies while addressing barriers to skill application.

Vocal Biomarker Analysis Powered by Canary Speech: Passive Early Identification

Vocal biomarker AI examines speech characteristics associated with mental health and cognitive conditions. The technology examines acoustic features, speech patterns, and vocal characteristics associated with depression, anxiety, suicide risk, cognitive decline, and stress. Analysis occurs during routine verbal interactions, such as scheduling calls, administrative contacts, or check-ins, when implemented with appropriate consent and privacy safeguards.

This passive detection reaches individuals who would not engage with traditional screening due to stigma concerns, lack of symptom awareness, or access barriers to formal assessments. When analysis identifies elevated risk indicators, it notifies clinicians, enabling proactive clinical outreach rather than waiting for individuals to self-identify needs and navigate appointment scheduling.

The Integrated Behavioral Health Care Ecosystem

The three components function together to create a coordinated care pathway. Consider a typical workflow: An individual engages with MoodHacker® for stress management, practicing cognitive restructuring and relaxation techniques independently. Two weeks later, they use eNcounter® to schedule a routine or emergency medical appointment. During their intake, Canary Speech's vocal biomarker analysis indicates elevated depression risk that the individual has not yet recognized as concerning.

The system immediately delivers the vocal assessment results to the remote provider. Alongside this, eNcounter®'s AI-powered virtual triage uses built-in symptom checking to assess patient-reported information, empowering the provider with an additional clinical data point before any appointment occurs. Together, these assessments allow the behavioral health provider to review multiple indicators and determine the level of risk before the individual has been seen. A provider then contacts the individual within days rather than waiting for symptoms to progress to crisis levels requiring emergency intervention.

From there, the individual connects with a licensed clinician during their scheduled appointment window or on-demand via eNcounter®. The platform's secure video capability allows the provider to see the patient in real time, offering visual clinical insights beyond what voice data alone can capture, including observable affect, demeanor, and behavioral cues that inform assessment. Combined with vocal assessment data, AI symptom checker results, and patient-reported information from MoodHacker® about which self-care strategies have already been attempted and what challenges have been encountered, the provider builds a comprehensive clinical picture without relying solely on patient recollection.

The provider develops a treatment plan integrating continued MoodHacker® engagement for skill practice with scheduled eNcounter® sessions for clinical support. Ongoing vocal biomarker analysis monitors vocal biomarkers to track treatment response and identify early indicators of deterioration. If crisis needs arise between appointments, the patient accesses immediate support through eNcounter®. If the patient is determined to be high risk, they will be routed or recommended to emergency services.

This integrated pathway delivers early detection through vocal biomarker analysis, immediate clinical access through eNcounter®, and continuous engagement through MoodHacker®. Providers gain visibility into patient functioning between appointments. Patients receive appropriate levels of support as needs change rather than waiting for scheduled appointments to report concerns.

4. Operational and Clinical Value

Early Intervention and Prevention

Immediate access prevents symptom escalation that occurs during extended wait periods. As established earlier, early-stage interventions require substantially less intensive treatment than advanced presentations. Detection before crisis reduces emergency department utilization, hospitalizations, and intensive outpatient program requirements, creating measurable cost savings.

Research examining technology-enabled behavioral health integration across 30 primary care and specialty clinics found that in the six months following implementation, emergency department utilization decreased by 34% in the treatment group, while the treatment-as-usual group experienced a 52.5% increase over the same period.²¹ The same study found statistically significant reductions in PHQ-9 depression scores (17.3%) and GAD-7 anxiety scores (12.4%) among patients using the integrated platform, improvements not observed in the treatment-as-usual group.²¹ These findings demonstrate that integrated platforms produce measurable clinical symptom improvement while preventing the escalation that drives emergency utilization.

Workforce Impact

The $1 trillion annual productivity cost of untreated depression and anxiety represents only part of the organizational burden.² Ninety-two percent of workers indicate that working for an organization that values emotional and psychological well-being is important to them,¹⁸ reflecting a broader expectation that employers play an active role in supporting behavioral health. Organizations implementing comprehensive behavioral health support demonstrate commitment to workforce wellbeing, affecting recruitment, retention, and organizational culture.

Given the provider shortage and burnout rates documented earlier, technology-enabled care becomes essential for extending workforce capacity within realistic constraints. Virtual delivery eliminates travel time between appointments while automated monitoring reduces time spent on routine follow-up. These efficiency gains allow existing providers to serve larger populations without proportional increases in clinical hours or headcount that cannot realistically be achieved through hiring.

Behavioral Health Support for Federal and Military Populations

Federal agencies, military branches, and first responder organizations face behavioral health challenges that exceed general population rates and carry direct operational consequences. Behavioral health conditions are the second most common medical reason for nondeployability in the U.S. Army, with approximately 20% of active-duty service members receiving behavioral health diagnoses through the Military Health System.²⁰ Veterans face similarly elevated risk, with PTSD prevalence reaching 23% among VA healthcare users compared to 6% in the general population.⁷ First responders develop behavioral health conditions at rates 50% higher than the general population.⁸

For these populations, access delays carry consequences beyond individual health outcomes. Untreated behavioral health conditions reduce operational readiness, affect mission capability, and increase risk of duty-related errors and attrition. Research in military populations confirms that telehealth psychiatric consultation produces equivalent clinical outcomes to in-person care while delivering services at lower cost.¹⁹ This evidence supports integrated virtual platforms as clinically credible solutions for populations where geographic dispersion, operational schedules, and stigma create substantial barriers to traditional in-person care.

The platform is built with NIST standards in mind to address the security and compliance requirements that federal and military deployments demand. Virtual care extends coverage to remote installations, deployed units, and shift-based environments where scheduled in-person appointments are operationally impractical. Continuous support tools provide accessible resources to personnel who may avoid formal counseling due to career concerns, while passive detection approaches offer clinicians visibility into populations that would otherwise go unscreened.

Population Health Management

Integrated platforms generate population-level data that individual care delivery cannot produce at scale. Because MoodHacker® engagement, Canary Speech risk scores, and eNcounter® utilization are captured continuously across an entire population, organizations gain visibility into trends that individual case management misses entirely. A spike in risk indicators across a specific unit may signal an environmental stressor that warrants organizational intervention before individuals reach crisis. Low engagement with self-guided tools in a high-need population may reveal a communication or access barrier that targeted outreach can address. This transforms behavioral health from a service individuals must seek out to a function organizations can actively monitor and manage at a systems level.

Operational Environments and Scalability

Organizational behavioral health needs vary substantially across operational contexts, requiring solutions that adapt to diverse scenarios rather than assuming standard clinical settings. Integrated virtual platforms address this variability through three key capabilities.

Geographic Flexibility Across Operational Environments

The solution functions in operational environments where traditional facility-based care proves impractical or impossible, such as remote installations, deployed units, shift work settings, or locations with limited behavioral health infrastructure. Secure virtual platforms maintain connectivity across geographic dispersal while preserving data protection requirements for sensitive health information. This geographic flexibility ensures consistent access regardless of location constraints.

Surge Capacity for Crisis Response

The integrated approach provides surge capacity when behavioral health demand exceeds available clinical resources. These surges are not limited to large-scale crises such as natural disasters or public health emergencies. Organizations regularly experience demand spikes following critical incidents, workforce disruptions, seasonal stressors, or community tragedies that temporarily overwhelm existing provider capacity. Integrated virtual platforms allow organizations to rapidly expand access to screening, self-management tools, and clinical support without requiring proportional increases in permanent staffing.

Cost-Effectiveness Through Scalability

This operational flexibility translates into cost-effectiveness. Organizations avoid the fixed overhead of maintaining facility-based capacity sufficient for infrequent peak-demand scenarios. Instead, scalable virtual infrastructure adjusts to actual utilization patterns. Cost avoidance from reduced emergency utilization, prevented hospitalizations, and decreased disability claims frequently exceeds implementation costs, creating a positive return on investment even before considering productivity improvements and workforce retention benefits.

Together, these capabilities enable organizations to maintain comprehensive behavioral health support across operational realities that traditional models cannot accommodate within realistic resource constraints.

5. Why GlobalMed

Many organizations approach behavioral health support through standalone applications or single-modality telehealth services. These point solutions address individual aspects of the access challenge without coordinating them into comprehensive care pathways. GlobalMed's approach differs in several fundamental ways.

Integrated Platform Architecture

eNcounter®, MoodHacker®, and Vocal Biomarker Analysis powered by Canary Speech function as coordinated components of a single system rather than separate tools requiring separate implementations and data environments. Clinical data flows between components, provider access connects directly to detection alerts, and self-management engagement informs clinical assessment. This integration creates closed-loop care rather than fragmented touchpoints.

Telehealth Infrastructure Beyond Video

Many behavioral health telehealth vendors offer video appointments. GlobalMed combines virtual care with AI-powered symptom assessment, passive vocal biomarker screening, and digital therapeutic tools, creating diagnostic and monitoring capabilities that video consultation alone cannot provide.

Proven Scale and Reliability

GlobalMed has enabled more than 100 million patient consultations across more than 60 countries. This deployment history reflects operational reliability in diverse settings including military installations, correctional facilities, remote locations, and austere environments where infrastructure limitations challenge other platforms.

EHR Interoperability

Integration with existing electronic health record systems means implementation does not require parallel documentation workflows. Clinical data captured through the platform flows into existing records, reducing administrative burden and supporting care continuity across providers and settings.

6. Implementation Considerations

Successful deployment of integrated behavioral health platforms requires structured planning that addresses technical integration, organizational adoption, and ongoing optimization. Three phases characterize effective implementation.

Phase 1: Planning and Integration

Initial planning establishes technical and operational foundations. Organizations should deploy a population needs assessment to examine current utilization patterns, identify gaps in existing services, and define priority populations for initial deployment. From there, technology integration ensures that platforms connect with existing electronic health record systems, support single sign-on authentication, and adhere to data governance frameworks. Security reviews confirm HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, encrypted data transmission, and access controls that protect sensitive health information while enabling appropriate clinical use.

Data governance alignment proves particularly critical. Organizations must define what information gets collected, how it is used, who has access, and what protections exist for individual privacy. Clear policies prevent inappropriate disclosure while enabling aggregate analytics that support population health management. Transparency about data practices builds the trust necessary for meaningful engagement.

Phase 2: Deployment and Adoption

Technical deployment represents only part of implementation success. Adoption depends on effective communication that addresses both practical and cultural factors. Individuals need to understand what services are available, how to access them, and, most importantly, that using these resources carries no stigma or professional consequences. Leadership engagement signals organizational commitment and models appropriate help-seeking behavior.

Provider education ensures that clinical staff understand how integrated tools enhance rather than replace their clinical judgment. Training covers how to interpret data from digital tools, when automated alerts warrant clinical attention, and how to incorporate remote monitoring into treatment planning. This preparation prevents the common failure mode in which technology is deployed but clinicians lack confidence in using it effectively.

Phase 3: Ongoing Optimization

Post-deployment optimization uses analytics to continuously improve effectiveness. Usage data reveals which components see the highest engagement, where individuals encounter barriers, and what outcomes result from different intervention pathways. Clinical outcome measurement tracks symptom improvement, treatment response, and recovery rates. Access metrics monitor time from need to first clinical contact and wait time reduction. Early detection metrics quantify how many individuals receive intervention before a crisis and how early identification affects treatment intensity requirements.

These insights inform iterative refinements. Low engagement with particular features may indicate usability issues, insufficient training, or misalignment with actual workflows. Regional variation in outcomes may reveal implementation factors affecting effectiveness. Continuous improvement treats deployment as an ongoing process rather than a one-time event, allowing systems to evolve as organizational needs and user behaviors change over time.

7. Conclusion: Technology as a Bridge, Not a Replacement

Behavioral health care infrastructure has not kept pace with demand, and traditional delivery models cannot close that gap through capacity alone. Integrated platforms are not designed to replace the providers, clinical relationships, and human judgment that effective behavioral health care requires. Rather, they serve as a bridge, extending provider reach to populations and settings that current infrastructure cannot serve, enabling earlier identification of individuals who need support, and maintaining continuous engagement between clinical encounters.

The result is a system in which providers can connect with more patients, act on earlier and more complete information, and deliver care more efficiently than episodic, facility-based models allow. When paired with appropriate governance, clinical oversight, and organizational commitment, technology becomes the infrastructure that connects growing behavioral health demand to limited provider capacity without replacing the care itself.

Take Action

Contact GlobalMed to discuss integrated behavioral health deployment for your organization.

+1 (480) 922-0044 [email protected] globalmed.com

References

1. National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). (2025). Mental health by the numbers. https://www.nami.org/mental-health-by-the-numbers/
2. World Health Organization (WHO). (2022). Mental health at work. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-at-work
3. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2025). State of the behavioral health workforce, 2025. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/data-research/Behavioral-Health-Workforce-Brief-2025.pdf
4. American Psychological Association (APA). (2022). Psychologists struggle to meet demand amid mental health crisis. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/practitioner/2022-covid-psychologist-workload.pdf
5. Wang, P.S., et al. (2005). Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 603-613. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1361014/
6. Hung, P., Negaro, S.N.D., Hantman, R.M., et al. (2025). Access and quality of mental health services in rural and urban America. University of South Carolina Rural Health Research Center Policy Brief. https://www.ruralhealthresearch.org/
7. Wisco, B.E., Nomamiukor, F.O., Marx, B.P., Krystal, J.H., Southwick, S.M., & Pietrzak, R.H. (2022). Posttraumatic stress disorder in US military Veterans: Results from the 2019-2020 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 83(2). https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/essentials/epidemiology.asp
8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2018). First responders: Behavioral health concerns, emergency response, and trauma. SAMHSA Disaster Technical Assistance Center Supplemental Research Bulletin. https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/dtac/supplementalresearchbulletin-firstresponders-may2018.pdf
9. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2025). Workforce projections dashboard. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/workforce-projections
10. National Council for Mental Wellbeing. (2023). New study: Behavioral health workforce shortage will negatively impact society. https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/news/help-wanted/
11. Costantini, S. (2025). How do mental health treatment delays impact long-term mortality? American Economic Review, 115(5), 1672-1707. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20240226
12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2018). Emergency department visits for mental and substance use disorders. HCUP Statistical Brief #216. https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb216-Mental-Substance-Use-Disorder-ED-Visit-Trends.jsp
13. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (n.d.). Suicide statistics. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide
14. Steinberg Institute. (Updated March 2026). Fact sheet: The cost benefits of early intervention in mental illness. https://steinberginstitute.org/fact-sheet-cost-benefits-early-intervention-mental-illness/
15. Greenup, E.P., & Best, D. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of no show or non-attendance rates among telehealth and in-person models of care. BMC Health Services Research, 25, 663. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-025-12826-2
16. Childs, A.W., et al. (2022). Virtual behavioral health treatment satisfaction and outcomes. Telemedicine and e-Health. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9302910/
17. Birney, A.J., Gunn, R., Russell, J.K., & Ary, D.V. (2016). MoodHacker mobile web app with email for adults to self-manage mild-to-moderate depression: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(1), e8. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4231
18. American Psychological Association (APA). (2023). 2023 Work in America Survey. https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/work-in-america/2023-workplace-health-well-being
19. Bellanti, D.M., Kelber, M.S., Workman, D.E., Beech, E.H., & Belsher, B.E. (2022). Rapid review on the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for the treatment of behavioral health disorders. Military Medicine, 187(5-6), e577. https://academic.oup.com/milmed/article/187/5-6/e577/6345927
20. Meadows, S.O., et al. (2022). 2018 Department of Defense Health Related Behaviors Survey. RAND Corporation/PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9242568/
21. Pardes, A., Rene, R., Chun, P., & Cherson, M. (2022). Technology-enabled behavioral health integration decreases emergency department utilization. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 18, e174501792208150. https://clinical-practice-and-epidemiology-in-mental-health.com/VOLUME/18/ELOCATOR/e174501792208150/

About GlobalMed

Founded in 2002 by a Marine Corps Reserve Veteran to bring healthcare access to the underserved, GlobalMed has become a global leader in virtual health technology. The company's platform supports patients at any point in the continuum of care, with integrated software and data-capturing tools that empower providers to deliver evidence-based treatment and improved outcomes.

GlobalMed technology has enabled 100 million consultations in over 60 countries. Built to the highest standards of security and compliance, GlobalMed's virtual health platform has earned the U.S. Defense Health Agency's Authority to Operate on the DoD network.

Contact Information: +1 (480) 922-0044 [email protected] globalmed.com